It qualifies as a free program license, but it may well not be a actual copyleft. This is a absolutely free software program license, and appropriate with GPLv3. It is also technically not appropriate with GPLv3 in a strict perception: you can not acquire code unveiled below the GNU AGPL and convey or modify it nevertheless you like below the phrases of GPLv3, or vice versa. How can I make positive bulletins like this really don't shock me again?